Posts Tagged 'Photography'

Lady Gaga Upsets Photographers with Concert Demands

Lady Gaga – Lady Gaga Upsets Photographers With Concert Demands

Gaga has requested that concert photographers (that is, the people who are being paid to photograph her concerts) sign a release form before being allowed to shoot her shows. This release form would relinquish the photographer’s copyrights in the photos they take and assign them to Gaga.

Generally, photographers own the copyrights to the pictures they take, and thus retain the rights of distribution and publication. One of Gaga’s releases—she apparently has two of them—requires them to assign the copyright to her, and thus give her the rights over all of their images.

So what’s the problem? Some would argue that the subject of a photo should be able to control how their image is used. However, I think the primary issue is summed up in the article: “The people who get paid $125 to hang out for four hours at a concert have to sign this release. So on top of getting paid very little, they have no ongoing revenue stream from these photos whatsoever.”

In many cases, these photographers’ work is their livelihood. They use expensive equipment and have a specialized expertise and knowledge that allows them to take the best pictures possible in any given environment. Forcing them to relinquish the rights to their work—especially work like this, which could be licensed for Gaga’s promotional materials or sold—would hurt their abilities to make a living, because they wouldn’t be able to get royalties or fees from licensing. They also wouldn’t get the attention that would come with having their name attached to a picture of Gaga that shows up in a magazine or news blog, so there’s a reputation element, too. (On the other hand, if their names are still attached to the photograph, and Gaga’s team undertakes some horrendous editing techniques, that could hurt the photog’s reputation if people don’t know that Gaga is controlling the look of those pictures.)

Gaga always struck me as someone who promoted and appreciated artists—her whole persona is something of a performance art piece, and she always hails individuality. I can only imagine that this move is an effort to further control her ever-changing image; that’s the only justification I can think of to explain this strategy, which might hurt some up-and-coming photographers who don’t have the power to negotiate to retain their copyrights.

Two Photography Links: Being an Uninsurable Loophole and Having Photos Stolen by the Gap

Woes of Getting Camera Gear Coverage as a Hobbyist (

My friend Derek tried to get an insurance policy for his camera gear. He’s invested in some great equipment, but photography is his hobby, so he opted for a personal policy. As it turns out, he’s not eligible for a personal OR a commercial policy. I know a lot of photographers who would fall in this weird, uninsurable middle ground, and I’m amazed that there’s not a good policy for people considered to be freelancers. Peter Parker would have been totally screwed.

Gap Uses Flickr Photo for Clothing Graphic Without Permission (PetaPixel)

This is, unfortunately, not a new problem (as several of the links in the comments will explain), but it’s completely ridiculous. I don’t know what it is about the Internet that makes people think they can steal photos or other content and use them to make money. It’s even more egregious that this photographer had a CC license that explicitly explained how his pictures could be used. I hope he’s able to get some money from the Gap for their infringement.

About the Author


%d bloggers like this: