Lady Gaga Upsets Photographers with Concert Demands

Lady Gaga – Lady Gaga Upsets Photographers With Concert Demands

Gaga has requested that concert photographers (that is, the people who are being paid to photograph her concerts) sign a release form before being allowed to shoot her shows. This release form would relinquish the photographer’s copyrights in the photos they take and assign them to Gaga.

Generally, photographers own the copyrights to the pictures they take, and thus retain the rights of distribution and publication. One of Gaga’s releases—she apparently has two of them—requires them to assign the copyright to her, and thus give her the rights over all of their images.

So what’s the problem? Some would argue that the subject of a photo should be able to control how their image is used. However, I think the primary issue is summed up in the article: “The people who get paid $125 to hang out for four hours at a concert have to sign this release. So on top of getting paid very little, they have no ongoing revenue stream from these photos whatsoever.”

In many cases, these photographers’ work is their livelihood. They use expensive equipment and have a specialized expertise and knowledge that allows them to take the best pictures possible in any given environment. Forcing them to relinquish the rights to their work—especially work like this, which could be licensed for Gaga’s promotional materials or sold—would hurt their abilities to make a living, because they wouldn’t be able to get royalties or fees from licensing. They also wouldn’t get the attention that would come with having their name attached to a picture of Gaga that shows up in a magazine or news blog, so there’s a reputation element, too. (On the other hand, if their names are still attached to the photograph, and Gaga’s team undertakes some horrendous editing techniques, that could hurt the photog’s reputation if people don’t know that Gaga is controlling the look of those pictures.)

Gaga always struck me as someone who promoted and appreciated artists—her whole persona is something of a performance art piece, and she always hails individuality. I can only imagine that this move is an effort to further control her ever-changing image; that’s the only justification I can think of to explain this strategy, which might hurt some up-and-coming photographers who don’t have the power to negotiate to retain their copyrights.


2 Responses to “Lady Gaga Upsets Photographers with Concert Demands”

  1. 1 kevin March 9, 2011 at 9:10 am

    Yeah, I found this to be absurd. The good news is, nobody is forcing them to do anything. Gaga wants them to sign this contract? Rip it up and walk away.
    Different photographers do a lots of different things, but I think one thing almost everyone agrees on is that the photographer ALWAYS retains the copyright. Trying to force someone to give that up is asinine…

    • 2 Jessica March 9, 2011 at 9:25 am

      I discussed this with a friend who used to do sideline shooting for UT sports events, and he said that he never retained the rights to the photos he took during games. I wondered if maybe that was because he was a student—that maybe UT saw it as a “privilege” to let him shoot UT Sports (or something else silly like that)—but I wasn’t sure.

      I completely agree with you about this. I wonder how many photographers are going to opt out of shooting, though. :\

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

About the Author



%d bloggers like this: